Legal Opinion
Robert S. Fremont and Henry W. Dybal v. McGraw Company, Robert S. Fremont, Ronald L. McCarthy and Henry W. Dybal v. McGraw Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 31, 1979No. 78-2630, 78-2631PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELL, Circuit Judge.
The three plaintiffs, Robert Fremont, Ronald McCarthy, and Henry Dybal, brought this action against their former employer, the Halo Lighting Division of McGraw-Edison Company (Company), to recover benefits allegedly due them under the Company’s Profit Sharing and Retirement Trust (the Plan). 1 The Company had denied them the Plan benefits on the ground that their theft of Company property made them ineligible under the Plan for the benefits. The plaintiffs asserted that Section 203 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1053, prohibited…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eaves v. PennCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Morgan v. Laborers Pension Trust Fund for N. Cal.District Court, N.D. California · 1977
- Winer v. Edison Bros. Stores Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Amory v. Boyden Associates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
3Cited by59 opinions
- Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Fentron Industries, Inc. v. The National Shopmen Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Lojek v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Leonard Thornton and William Carothers, Etc. v. James E. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.