Anderson v. Hudak
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.
In an adverse possession action, the trial court granted judgment in favor of Anderson. We hold that the planting of a row of trees alone, without some use that is open and hostile, does not satisfy the ele*400ments of adverse possession and that the grant of an easement for tree airspace and maintenance was also improper. We reverse.
Lawrence and Janet Hudak (Hudaks) appeal a judgment entered in a boundary dispute with their neighbor, Delores Anderson (Anderson), that quieted title to a portion of the disputed land in Anderson based upon adverse possession. The Anderson and Hudak properties began…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Peeples v. Port of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Frolund v. FranklandWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Howard v. KuntoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Harris v. UrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Harris v. UrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Riley v. AndresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Riley v. AndresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Bryant v. Palmer Coking Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.