Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Hudak

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 1, 1995No. 17787-1-IIPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.

In an adverse possession action, the trial court granted judgment in favor of Anderson. We hold that the planting of a row of trees alone, without some use that is open and hostile, does not satisfy the ele*400ments of adverse possession and that the grant of an easement for tree airspace and maintenance was also improper. We reverse.

Lawrence and Janet Hudak (Hudaks) appeal a judgment entered in a boundary dispute with their neighbor, Delores Anderson (Anderson), that quieted title to a portion of the disputed land in Anderson based upon adverse possession. The Anderson and Hudak properties began…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Peeples v. Port of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Frolund v. FranklandWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Howard v. KuntoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Harris v. UrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. Harris v. UrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. Riley v. AndresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Riley v. AndresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Bryant v. Palmer Coking Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API