Legal Opinion

Chaplin v. Sanders

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1984No. 49663-3PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

A judgment was entered by the trial court in favor of Peter and Patricia Sanders, petitioners herein, awarding a part of property claimed by them by virtue of adverse possession from their neighbors Kent and Barbara Chaplin and Kenneth and Hazel Chaplin. The Court of Appeals reversed, finding no "hostility" in Sanders' possession of the property. We reverse the Court of Appeals and hold in favor of petitioners on all aspects of their claim.

This case presents two issues relating to the doctrine of adverse possession. Does a claimant's actual notice of the true owner's interest in the land…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Van Valkenburgh v. LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Ellis v. JansingTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re the Marriage of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Peeples v. Port of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Diel v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Lilly v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. Denny's Restaurants, Inc. v. Security Union Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  3. Lejeune v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  4. ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Merriman v. CokeleyWashington Supreme Court · 2010

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API