Riley v. Andres
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, C. J.
The Rileys and the Andres are neighbors with a common boundary line. The Rileys claim that they adversely possessed part of the Andres’ lot while the Andres’ predecessors in title, the Gaults, owned it. The Rileys sued and moved for summary judgment. Because the Gaults had both died, the Andres could not show how the Rileys or the Gaults had used the disputed land. As a result, the Andres presented nothing to counter the Rileys’ statements as to the Gaults’ use of the disputed land. The Andres did challenge the Rileys’ credibility, offering statements by Mrs. Riley that the land belonged to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Felsman v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Anderson v. HudakCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Happy Bunch, LLC v. Grandview North, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- BROWN EX REL. RICHARDS v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Happy Bunch, LLC v. Grandview North, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Riley v. AndresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.