Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Palmer Coking Coal Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 5, 1997No. 34617-2-I, 36611-4-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

William and Maxine Bryant commenced this action to quiet title to two parcels of property in Black Diamond owned by Palmer Coking Coal Company. The trial court ruled that Bryant established adverse possession to the surface rights of both parcels. But the court also concluded that Bryant did not adversely possess the underground mineral rights to either parcel. Palmer ap peals the decision that divests it of title to the surface rights. Bryant cross-appeals the trial court’s determination that he did not acquire subsurface mineral rights by adverse possession. We affirm in part and reverse in…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Ridgeview Properties v. StarbuckWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Metropolitan Park District of Tacoma v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1986

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lilly v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. Happy Bunch, LLC v. Grandview North, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Happy Bunch, LLC v. Grandview North, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Cantu v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. Cantu v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API