Howard v. Kunto
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.
Land surveying is an ancient art but not one free of the errors that often creep into the affairs of men. In this case, we are presented with the question of what happens when the descriptions in deeds do not fit the land the deed holders are occupying. Defendants appeal from a decree quieting title in the plaintiffs of a tract of land on the shore of Hood Canal in Mason County.
At least as long ago as 1932 the record tells us that one McCall resided in the house now occupied by the appellant-defendants, Kunto. McCall bad a deed that described a 50-foot-wide parcel on the shore of Hood Canal.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- El Cerrito, Inc. v. RyndakWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Butler v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Skoog v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Naher v. FarmerWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Faubion v. ElderWashington Supreme Court · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Roche v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- GRANITE BEACH HOLDINGS v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Granite Beach Holdings, L.L.C. v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Lee v. LozierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.