Legal Opinion
Harris v. Urell
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 23, 2006No. 33592-1-IIPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
135 P.3d 530 (2006)
133 Wash.App. 130
Janyce HARRIS, a single woman, Respondent,
v.
Robert URELL and Tina Urell, a married couple, Appellant.
No. 33592-1-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
May 23, 2006.
Philip A. Foster, Vancouver, WA, for Appellant.
Robert Urell, Washougal, WA, pro se, Appellant.
Steven Erik Turner, Miller Nash LLP, Vancouver, WA, for Respondent.
OPINION PUBLISHED IN PART
HUNT, J.
¶ 1 Robert and Tina Urell appeal the trial court's order quieting title in Janyce Harris by adverse possession of a disputed driveway on their titled property. The Urells argue that (1) Harris did…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Ridgeview Properties v. StarbuckWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Daughtry v. Jet Aeration Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- Petersen v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Mitchell v. Washington State Institute of Public PolicyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Pierce County v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Skagit County Public Hospital District No. 1 v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Forbes v. AMERICAN BLDG. MAINTENANCE CO.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Forbes v. American Building Maintenance Co. WestCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.