ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. Bell
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.
ITT Rayonier, Inc. (ITT), plaintiff, instituted this action to quiet title to property situated in Clallam County. In addition, ITT prayed for damages for trespass and for the ejectment of defendant Arthur Bell. Bell answered, alleging ITT was not entitled to judgment in its favor by reason of Bell's adverse possession of the property for a period greater than the statutory period of 10 years. Additionally, Bell counterclaimed against ITT praying for judgment quieting title in Bell. On July 8, 1986, the trial court entered partial summary judgment, quieting title in favor of ITT. The Court of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Peeples v. Port of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Skansi v. NovakWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Young v. NewbroWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Wood v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Lilly v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Gorman v. City of WoodinvilleWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Kunkel v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Kunkel v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Happy Bunch, LLC v. Grandview North, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.