Hannah v. Steinman
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying him any relief and from an order denying his motion for a new trial in an action brought by him to obtain a decree that a contract of lease has been rescinded.
Defendant is the owner of an unimproved lot of land in San Francisco, with a frontage of ninety feet on the northerly line of Geary Street between Larkin and Hyde streets. On July 7, 1906, a contract of lease was executed by the parties, whereby defendant let to plaintiff and plaintiff hired from defendant said lot for a term of three years commencing August 7, 1906, for the sum of nine thousand…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Guarantee Co. of North America v. Mechanics' Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Sherwood v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Blakeman v. BlakemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
- Bedell v. WilderSupreme Court of Vermont · 1892
3Cited by36 opinions
- Pauley Petroleum Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Bancroft v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Stock v. MeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Gartner v. EikillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.