Legal Opinion

London & San Francisco Bank v. Bandmann

California Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1898No. S. F. No. 663PublishedCited by 33 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. A. A. Sanderson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This action is brought to foreclose a mortgage executed July 21, 1888. This mortgage was given to secure “the present indebtedness of Julius Bandmann to said bank, and such advances as said bank may hereafter make to said Julius Bandmann, with interest thereon at the rate of eight per cent per annum.” The case is now before us upon an appeal from the judgment .without a hill of exceptions. By the findings of fact it appears that at the time the mortgage was given Bandmann was in debt to the bank in the sum of about sixty-eight thousand dollars which indebtedness was evidenced by two…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harralson v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Wells v. HarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Daw v. NilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. German Savings & Loan Society v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Newhall v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API