Legal Opinion

Gray v. Cotton

California Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1917No. Sac. No. 2581PublishedCited by 43 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order refusing a new trial. Peter J. Shields, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

In this ease on May 8, 1916, judgment was entered, on motion of the plaintiff, against H. D. Rowe as surety in an undertaking given by him on behalf of the defendants for the stay of execution upon an appeal taken by said defendants from a judgment against them for $7,443.70, made up of several items set forth in separate counts of the complaint. That appeal was successful only with respect to the first count. As to that item the judgment was reversed. As to the other items it was, in effect, affirmed, and the cause was remanded with directions to the court below to enter judgment therefor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harper v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Mowry v. HeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Levy v. Magnolia Lodge, No. 29, I. O. O. F.California Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Gray v. CottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Meredith v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of BaltimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Stock v. MeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Efron v. KalmanovitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. City of Pasadena v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Merritt v. J. A. Stafford Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Reeves v. ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API