Legal Opinion

Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of Medicine

California Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1942No. S. F. No. 16648PublishedCited by 227 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendants after an order sustaining defendants’ demurrers to the fifth amended complaint without leave to amend. Plaintiffs’ original and first four amended complaints charged the defendants with negligence. In these complaints it was alleged that the plaintiff, Cecilia Wennerholm, consulted her family physician in regard to her obesity and that he prescribed dinitrophenol for her on a written prescription which was filled by a pharmacy. While under the care of her physician, plaintiff took the drug, which was manufactured by one of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by227 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Mirkin v. WassermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

222 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API