Legal Opinion

Noland v. Noland

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1941No. Civ. 12425PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

The third party claimant appeals from a judgment rendered against it in a proceeding pursuant to section 689 of the Code of Civil Procedure to determine title to a certain automobile registered in the name of the judgment debtor and upon which a levy of execution had been made. An appeal is also attempted from an order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial, “to vacate the judgment, to strike the cost bill, to strike the findings of fact and conclusions of law and to tax costs”.

Appellant, the legal owner and chattel mortgagee of the car in question, claims title by virtue of a pledge sale…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Treat v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Harper v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Sinsheimer v. WhitelyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Colver v. W. B. Scarborough Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Ross v. O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leoni v. DelanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Harriman v. TetikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Rosland v. ConstantineauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Fairbairn v. FairbairnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Leoni v. DelanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API