Ross v. O'Brien
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HARDEN, J., pro tem.
This is an action to recover damages for alleged malicious prosecution of a criminal action against J. Edgar Ross, plaintiff herein. At the conclusion of a jury trial the court directed a verdict for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered thereon.
Appellant has failed to comply with the requirements of section 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure by printing in his brief or in a supplement thereto such portions of the record as he desires to call to the attention of the court; and respondent has filed no brief whatever.
An action was started in the Justice’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Heath v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
- Moore v. DurrerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Sinsheimer v. WhitelyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jiménez v. SánchezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
- People v. ScrivensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Thomas v. HintonIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- Jackson v. BeckhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Keylon v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.