Rosland v. Constantineau
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
From an order made during the proceedings for the probate of the estate of Irene Porter Rosland pursuant to section 660 et seq. of the Probate Code, setting apart exempt personal property and a probate homestead tó Oscar E. Rosland, the surviving husband of decedent, for the period of his natural life, the executor of the estate has appealed, presenting three points as grounds for the reversal of the order.
1. Are the findings of fact contained in the order sufficient? All issues of fact joined in probate proceedings must be tried in conformity with the rules of practice in civil actions.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Brownell v. Superior Court of Yolo Cty.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Estate of JanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- In Re Estate of PendellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Treat v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Baker v. Eilers Music Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Chamberlain v. WakefieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Estate of McAfeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Estate of ClausseniusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Sandersfeld v. DochertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Peebler v. SeawellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.