Sinsheimer v. Whitely
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County and from an order denying a new trial. V. A. Gregg, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Britt, C.
Replevin for two hundred and seventeen sacks of beans. Defendant Whitely is constable of a certain township in San Luis Obispo county, and as such levied on the beans as the property of one Costa in virtue of a writ of attachment to him issued out of the justice’s court of said township at the suit of one Lial against said Costa. At the time of the levy the *379beans were stored in a warehouse at Pismo, in said county, owned by the Jordan Bituminous Rock and Paving Company, a corporation, which is joined with the constable as a defendant in this action. In November, 1893, said Costa, who…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brusie v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Shepardson v. CaryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Hale v. Milwaukee Dock Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Lowrie v. S. SalzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Robson v. SwartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Franklin National Bank v. WhiteheadIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- L. C. Jones Trucking Co. v. Superior Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- Hart v. Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- National Bank of Commerce v. Flanagan Mills & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1916
- Colver v. W. B. Scarborough Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.