Harper v. Gordon
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Replevin. Defendant had judgment on motion for a nonsuit upon the opening statement of counsel for plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment by bill of exceptions.
The complaint sets forth the ordinary action of claim and delivery. Counsel for plaintiff in his opening statement stated to the court the nature of the suit; that the chattels, the subject of the action, were included in a chattel mortgage executed by defendant to plaintiff’s assignor, and that the action is one of claim and delivery, based solely on said mortgage; that “the mortgage contained a provision that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Flinn v. FerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Carson v. ThewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1886
- Palmer & Rey v. Marysville Democrat Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Barfield v. South Side Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Blodgett v. RheinschildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Fawkes v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Murphy v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Mills v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.