Harriman v. Tetik
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
On October 19, 1958 plaintiff agreed to buy a half interest in defendant Tetik’s cocktail lounge, the “Fancy Free.” Tetik had listed the entire business for sale, and the parties contemplated sale of the remaining half when plaintiff had learned the business and raised the capital. They agreed to operate the business as a partnership in the meantime. The contract, drawn as an escrow agreement on a form provided by defendant Calstate Escrow Service, stated that Harriman would pay into escrow the full price of $9,500. He also promised to pay directly to Tetik half the value of the liquor on…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Caplan v. SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- River Garden Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- United Business Commission v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- In Re Marriage of SkadenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Kalogeras v. 239 Broad Avenue, L.L.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.