Beeman v. Burling
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
Appellant Spencer M. Burling appeals a default judgment rendered against him in the amount of $197,044.01. He asserts (1) the default judgment must be vacated because he was not personally served with the statement of damages and because respondent’s proof at the default hearing amounted to a de facto amendment of the complaint, which should have revived appellant’s ability to respond; (2) the judgment relies upon two sections of the San Francisco Rent Ordinance that are unconstitutional; (3) the judgment exceeds the relief demanded and thus must be reduced; and (4) the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Carroll v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Kizer v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Saunders v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Citizens of Humanity, LLC v. Costco Wholesale Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Pazderka v. Caballeros Dimas Alang, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Carlsen v. KoivumakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.