Legal Opinion

Pazderka v. Caballeros Dimas Alang, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1998No. A078278PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAMBDEN, J.

Caballeros Dimas Alang, Inc. (CDA) made an offer to compromise to Franti and Julie Pazderka (Pazderkas) pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998, which the Pazderkas accepted. (All further unspecified code sections refer to the Code of Civil Procedure.) The Pazderkas presented the signed agreement to the clerk of the superior court, who entered judgment pursuant to section 998. The Pazderkas, thereafter, successfully moved for an award of attorneys’ fees. CDA filed a motion which, among other things, requested reconsideration of the award for attorneys’ fees, relief…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Rappleyea v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. T. M. Cobb Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. CastelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. H. D. Arnaiz Ltd. v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API