Carroll v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*895Opinion
KAUS, J.
I
Appeal from orders made pursuant to section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1 vacating and setting aside a judgment of dismissal. (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (b).)
This is the problem: Section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure permits relief for “excusable” neglect. The word “excusable” means just that: inexcusable neglect prevents relief. (Luz v. Lopes (1960) 55 Cal.2d 54, 65 [10 Cal.Rptr. 161, 358 P.2d 289]; Benjamin v. Dalmo Mfg. Co. (1948) 31 Cal.2d 523, 528-533 [190 P.2d 593].) Further, as a general rule an attorney’s inexcusable neglect is chargeable to the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Weitz v. YankoskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Johnson v. Allis Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. PietakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Garcia v. HejmadiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.