Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1982No. L.A. 31481PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*895Opinion

KAUS, J.

I

Appeal from orders made pursuant to section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1 vacating and setting aside a judgment of dismissal. (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (b).)

This is the problem: Section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure permits relief for “excusable” neglect. The word “excusable” means just that: inexcusable neglect prevents relief. (Luz v. Lopes (1960) 55 Cal.2d 54, 65 [10 Cal.Rptr. 161, 358 P.2d 289]; Benjamin v. Dalmo Mfg. Co. (1948) 31 Cal.2d 523, 528-533 [190 P.2d 593].) Further, as a general rule an attorney’s inexcusable neglect is chargeable to the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Weitz v. YankoskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnson v. Allis Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. PietakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Garcia v. HejmadiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API