Legal Opinion

Saunders v. Taylor

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1996No. E013318PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

Factual and Procedural Background

In 1987, Mr. and Mrs. Saunders purchased a house from Mr. and Mrs. Taylor for $87,500. Prior to the close of escrow, the Taylors executed and delivered a real estate transfer disclosure statement to the Saunderses as required by Civil Code 1 section 1102.2 et seq. That disclosure form asked, inter alia, whether the sellers were aware of any “[rjoom additions, structural modifications, or other alterations or repairs made without necessary permits” or which were “not in compliance with building codes.” (§ 1102.6.) The Taylors answered “no”…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Davis v. BelingNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Khajavi v. Feather River Anesthesia Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Citizens of Humanity, LLC v. Costco Wholesale Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Powerhouse Motorsports Group, Inc. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Brand v. Hyundai Motor AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API