Fisher v. City of Berkeley
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
Plaintiffs, a group of landlords who own property in the City of Berkeley, appeal from a judgment of the Alameda County Superior Court holding defendants’ rent control ordinance constitutional on its face. We substantially affirm the judgment.
Plaintiffs claim that defendants’ ordinance conflicts with, and hence is preempted by, federal antitrust law because it is a combination that unreasonably restrains interstate commerce in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (Act or Sherman Act). (15 U.S.C.) They also claim that it constitutes monopolization, or attempted…
2Cases cited116 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by210 opinions
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Lavie v. Procter & Gamble Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.