Legal Opinion
Kizer v. County of San Mateo
California Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1991No. S014800PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PANELLI,J.
—We granted review to determine whether Government Code section 818 1 prevents the state from imposing statutory civil penalties pursuant to the Long-Term Care, Health, Safety, and Security Act of 1973 (Health & Saf. Code, § 1417 et seq.; hereafter the Act) 2 on a state-licensed, county-operated, long-term health care facility. We conclude that it does not.
Respondent County of San Mateo, Department of Health Services (the County), is licensed by the State Department of Health Services (the Department) to operate Crystal Springs Rehabilitation Center (Crystal Springs), a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
- State Department of Public Health v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- California Ass'n of Health Facilities v. Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.