Carlsen v. Koivumaki
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
This is a defendant’s summary judgment case. A summary judgment may be granted a defendant if it is shown that the plaintiff cannot establish one or more elements of his or her cause of action or that there is a complete defense to the claim. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (p)(2).) A defendant’s “burden of production is to show that ‘ “one or more elements of’ the [plaintiff’s] “cause of action” . . . “cannot be established [Citations.] The burden can be satisfied by a showing that ‘the plaintiff does not possess, and cannot reasonably obtain, needed evidence . . .…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
- Hughes v. PairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Kimberly Marroquin v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Donat v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Arnold Eng'g Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- (PC) Gelazela v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (PS) Murphy v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.