Legal Opinion
Sparks v. Board of Dental Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 23, 1942No. Civ. 2733PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment dissolving an alternative writ of mandate and refusing to order the Board of Dental Examiners of the State of California to reinstate the license of petitioner to practice dentistry.
Petitioner had been duly licensed to practice dentistry in California. He maintained offices in San Diego and employed Archie Bell, an unlicensed person, as technician.
In the fall of 1935 two accusations were filed against petitioner with respondent board. Four counts were based on alleged acts of Archie Bell in practicing dentistry between September 18 and October 31, 1935, in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Winning v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Jacobs v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Homan v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dare v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Mast v. State Board of OptometryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Valtz v. Penta Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Houghtaling v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN BERNARDINO CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Brennan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.