Legal Opinion

Valtz v. Penta Investment Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 10, 1983No. Civ. 26918PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN (Gerald), P. J .

Penta Investment Corporation and Marshall Skolnik, O.D., appeal an order granting Robert and Marie-Claire Valtz a writ of mandate compelling appellants to allow the Valtzs to inspect and copy Penta’s shareholder list.

Penta is a Delaware corporation doing business in California and has its sole executive office here. It manufactures, wholesales and retails prescription eyewear. The Valtzs own more than 5 percent of Penta’s outstanding stock and were officers of the coiporation until 1980. The Valtzs now own and operate the Eyeglass Company, a chain of eyeglass…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Havlicek v. Coast-To-Coast Analytical Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. William P. Sadler, Barbara K. Sadler, and American Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Ncr CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Dye v. Sachs (In Re Flashcom, Inc.)District Court, C.D. California · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API