Legal Opinion
Miskin v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 16, 1999No. CIV. A. WMN-92-2975PublishedCited by 207 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■ MEMORANDUM
GRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case has been assigned to me for final disposition, with the consent of the parties. 1 Local Rule 301.4; 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Currently ripe for resolution is the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Baxter Healthcare Corporation (“Baxter”), which has been fully, indeed too-fully, briefed. 2 (Papers No. 22, 23, 26, 28, 33, 36, and 37.) No hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105.6; Sakaria v. TWA, 8 F.3d 164, 169 (4th Cir.1993). For the reasons explained .below, Baxter’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
This lawsuit stems from surgery the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Donald R. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DATA GENERAL CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by207 opinions
- Casey v. Geek Squad® Subsidiary Best Buy Stores, L.P.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Lorraine v. Markel American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- Shreve v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Bosse v. Baltimore CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Chika v. Planning Research Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
202 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.