Legal Opinion
Shreve v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 25, 2001No. CIV.A. AMD 00-2162PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DAVIS, District Judge.
Contents
I.INTRODUCTION.386
II.FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY.386
III.DR. JOSEPH SHELLY IS NOT A QUALIFIED EXPERT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THIS CASE, AND HIS OPINION TESTIMONY IS NOT ADMISSIBLE BECAUSE HIS OPINIONS WERE NOT RELIABLY DERIVED FROM SOUND SCIENTIFIC OR ENGINEERING METHODOLOGIES; NO SUCH INFIRMITIES APPLY TO THE DEFENDANTS’ EXPERTS.390
A. Dr. Shelly Lacks Relevant Qualifications Under the Circumstances of this Case.391
B. Although Dr. Shelly Has Identified Valid Scientific/Technical Methodologies and Has Applied Appropriate Labels to his Analytical…
2Cases cited95 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Heckman v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- JFJ Toys, Inc. v. Sears Holdings Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Wood v. Credit One BankDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
- Maxwell Kadel v. Dale FolwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
- Parker v. Allentown, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.