Legal Opinion
Lorraine v. Markel American Insurance
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 4, 2007No. Civil Action No. PWG-06-1893PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRIMM, Chief United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Jack Lorraine and Beverly Mack bring this action to enforce a private arbitrator’s award finding that certain damage to their yacht, Chessie, was caused by a lightning strike that occurred on May 17, 2004, while Chessie was anchored in the Chesapeake Bay.1 Defendant/ Counter-Plaintiff Markel American Insurance Company (“Markel”) likewise has counterclaimed to enforce the arbitrator’s award, which, in addition to concluding that certain damage to Chessie’s hull was caused by lightning, also concluded…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Donald R. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DATA GENERAL CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- State v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Tienda, Ronnie Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- People v. GoldsmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Hape v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Williams v. LongDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- United States v. Tony BrowneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.