Putz v. Putz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANCASTER, Justice.
This is an appeal by Benton County from a court of appeals’ decision affirming a child support magistrate’s order that reduced Paul Ben-Yehuda’s monthly child support obligation from $400 to $50. Ben-Yehuda sought the downward modification after voluntarily terminating his full-time employment and enrolling full time as an undergraduate student at Saint Cloud State University. We reverse and remand.
I
Paul Ben-Yehuda — formerly known as Paul Putz — and Jamile Putz were married in 1992. In September 1994, Ben-Yehuda and Putz had their only child: Rita Marie Putz.1…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In Re GlaxoSmithKline PlcSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Lietz v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Greene v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Doe 175 ex rel. Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School District, ISD No. 13Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.