Legal Opinion

In Re GlaxoSmithKline Plc

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 14, 2005No. A04-2150, A04-2151PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Justice.

We review orders of the court of appeals dismissing two appeals by appellant State of Minnesota from an order of the Henne-pin County District Court determining that certain discovery documents produced pursuant to a Civil Investigative Demand were confidential and could not be made public. The court of appeals denied discretionary review under Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 105.01 and a separate panel then dismissed the appeal of right under Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 103.03. We granted the state’s petitions for review of both orders and consolidated the matters. We reverse the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Blue Shield of Va. v. McCreadySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Hapka v. Paquin FarmsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. George v. Estate of BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Ruiz v. 1st Fidelity Loan Servicing, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  4. State of Minnesota v. Joshua Lee MyhreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  5. State v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API