Legal Opinion

Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 14, 2000No. C5-99-704PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

The court of appeals affirmed dismissal of a suit for underinsured motorist (“UIM”) benefits because it was commenced more than six years after the accident in which the injury occurred. We are asked to determine whether the statute of limitations begins to run on a UIM claim on the date of the accident or at a later time. In the past, we have indicated that the claim accrues and the limitations period commences at the time of the accident that causes the injury. See Weeks v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 580 N.W.2d 24, 27 (Minn.1998); O’Neill v. Illinois Farmers Ins.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Johnson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Register v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API