Legal Opinion

In Re Cary's Estate

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 19, 1936No. 24275PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant in error, Central National Bank, will be referred to as plaintiff, and Margaret S. Cary, administratrix, plaintiff in error, as defendant.

On the 8th day of December, 1930, John Ira Cary died, leaving a widow, Margaret S. Cary, and three minor children; and on December 15, 1930, his widow was appointed administratrix of his estate. On the 6th day of January, 1931, the county court made an order allowing $750 a month for the support of deceased's family "until the return of the inventory in said estate; and that said allowance date from December 8, 1930." The inventory was not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Cornell v. EdsenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. In re estate of LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Commercial Travelers' Mut. Acc. Ass'n v. FultonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bridal v. Cottonwood Creek Conservancy District No. IISupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Harjo v. AubreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Salter v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. In Re Concer's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Dobson v. MacomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API