Legal Opinion
Bridal v. Cottonwood Creek Conservancy District No. II
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 29, 1965No. 40716PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
This case involves the creation, and certain operations, of Cottonwood Creek Conservancy District No. 11, which will hereinafter be referred to merely as the “District”.
As described in its petition for creation that was filed in this court in November, 1957, the District was to include lands in Cottonwood Creek’s watershed that are located in Canadian, as well as Logan, Oklahoma and Kingfisher Counties. One of the parties signing the petition was the plaintiff in error, Helen Hilpirt, hereinafter referred to by surname only. She resides, and owns land, in Oklahoma County,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Larsen v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- People Ex Rel. Rogers v. LetfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- Carstens v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- People ex rel. Setters v. LeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Armstrong v. Sewer Improvement Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Timpanogos Planning & Water Management Agency v. Central Utah Water Conservancy DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- DUNARBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1973
- In Re the Master Contract Between the Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict & United StatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- Leveridge v. NotarasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Witt v. Turkey Creek Conservancy District in KingfisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.