Ruggles v. Welch
California Supreme Court
Appeals from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco directing the payment of a family allowance and from a decree of partial distribution. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Two separate appeals are brought to this court by the special administrator of the estate, but they may advantageously be considered and determined together.
In the first (No. 15889) the special administrator appeals from an order directing him to pay the arrearage of family allowance which has accrued since the suspension of the general administrator.
In the second (No. 15890) he appeals from a decree of partial distribution, by which he is directed to pay five thousand dollars to the widow. All of the proceedings leading to this decree were had while there was no *429general administrator, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re estate of LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Roach v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- In re Estate of MarreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- In re MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- In re McCAUSLANDCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Landers v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Jones v. LamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Estate of KesslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Rice v. CareyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.