In re estate of Lux
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Mateo County granting a family allowance. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
This is an appeal by Miranda W. Lux, widow of Charles Lux, deceased, from an order of the superior court made May 13 and filed May 17, 1892, allowing her the sum of one thousand dollars per month, as an allowance for her support, from August 30, 1888, to November 16, 1891.
Charles Lux died testate in March, 1887, leaving an estate of the value of four million dollars or more, of which ninety per cent was the partnership interest of the deceased in the firm of Miller & Lux. The indebtedness of the estate appears to be about four thousand, dollars. Under the partnership agreement, as well also…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Estate of StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Von Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Heirs of Sawyer v. SawyerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
3Cited by41 opinions
- Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In Re Wilson's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- Landers v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- In Re Estate of BumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.