Legal Opinion

In Re Concer's Estate

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 25, 1954No. 35933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

271 P.2d 329 (1954)

In re CONCER'S ESTATE.

DOBSON et al.

v.

MACOM et al.

No. 35933.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 25, 1954.

Hulsey & Hulsey, McAlester, for plaintiffs in error.

Windham & Windham, Poteau, for defendants in error.

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

Plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to as appellants, are the first cousins of the deceased, Mary Ann Concer, who, at the time of her death, was seized, among other property, of her allotment of land as a member of the Choctaw Tribe of Indians.

In the proceedings to determine who were decedent's heirs and to administer her estate in the County Court of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Unknown Heirs of PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  2. In Re BensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Martin v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  4. Taylor v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Adair v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ray Ex Rel. Ray v. WoodardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  2. In Re OzeyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Livingston v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. In re Estate of PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  5. In re the Estate of LevySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API