Legal Opinion
Vincent J. Frilette and Paul B. Weisz v. Charles Newton Kimberlin, Jr. And Elroy Merle Gladrow
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 26, 1969No. Patent Appeal 8141PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
Frilette and Weisz (Frilette et al.) appeal from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding Kimberlin and Gladrow (Kimberlin et al.) priority as to the two counts in interference No. 92,280, involving Kimberlin et al. patent No. 2,971,903 1 granted on an application filed February 5, 1957 and an application of Frilette et al. 2 filed on September 26,1958. The Kimberlin et al. patent is assigned to Esso Research and Engineering Company and the Frilette et al. application to Mobil Oil Corporation. 3
As junior party having the burden of proving priority by a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ritter v. Rohm & Haas CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- James A. Patterson and Glenn K. Lissner v. Karl-Heinz HauckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Teter v. KearbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- Torsten Hasselstrom and Malcolm C. Henry v. Blaine C. McKusickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Vandenberg v. ReynoldsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Shu-Hui Chen and Vittorio Farina v. Herve Bouchard, Jean-Dominique Bourzat, and Alain CommerconCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Elmar Bosies and Rudi Gall v. James J. Benedict and Christopher M. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Peeler v. MillerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Horwath v. LeeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Application of Vincent J. Frilette and Paul B. WeiszCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.