Legal Opinion
James A. Patterson and Glenn K. Lissner v. Karl-Heinz Hauck
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 18, 1965No. Patent Appeal 7262PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences, adhered to on reconsideration, awarding priorit> to Hauck.
Hauck is involved on the basis of his application, serial No. 554,133, filed December 20, 1955. On a motion to shift the burden of proof he was given the benefit of the filing date of a German convention application, December 23, 1954, as the result of which he became senior party.
Patterson and Lissner are the present applicants of an application, serial No. 520,137, filed July 5, 1955, by Patterson and Abrams. The interference, No. 89,-824, was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Application of Maximilian Paul SchmidtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- Torsten Hasselstrom and Malcolm C. Henry v. Blaine C. McKusickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- James L. Gianladis v. Gus S. KassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Thurston v. WulffCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- Benjamin Phillips and Paul S. Starcher v. Arthur W. CarlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Reese v. HurstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Peeler v. MillerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Velsicol Chemical Corporation v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Mikus v. WachtelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.