Legal Opinion

Vandenberg v. Reynolds

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 7, 1959No. Patent Appeal 6440PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This is a patent interference on a single count which reads:

“The process which comprises polymerizing a mixture of buta-diene-1,3 and styrene at a temperature below 0°C. in aqueous emulsion in the presence of methanol, an emulsifying agent, an activating-reducing composition comprising a ferrous compound, and as the catalyst a phenylcyclohexyl hydroper-oxide in which the hydroperoxy group is attached to that carbon atom in the cyclohexyl ring which is attached to the phenyl ring.” (Emphasis ours.)

In short, the invention is a process of making synthetic rubber and its novelty…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edwin J. Vandenberg v. William B. ReynoldsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  2. Smith v. SwaineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  3. Brooker v. RiesterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. CurtissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. Nitz v. EhrenreichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  3. Duffy v. TegtmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  4. Vincent J. Frilette and Paul B. Weisz v. Charles Newton Kimberlin, Jr. And Elroy Merle GladrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  5. Allan Robert Andrew Beeber and Daniel S. Spechler v. Lester C. Krogh and Richard E. BrinkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API