Legal Opinion
Vandenberg v. Reynolds
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided July 7, 1959No. Patent Appeal 6440PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This is a patent interference on a single count which reads:
“The process which comprises polymerizing a mixture of buta-diene-1,3 and styrene at a temperature below 0°C. in aqueous emulsion in the presence of methanol, an emulsifying agent, an activating-reducing composition comprising a ferrous compound, and as the catalyst a phenylcyclohexyl hydroper-oxide in which the hydroperoxy group is attached to that carbon atom in the cyclohexyl ring which is attached to the phenyl ring.” (Emphasis ours.)
In short, the invention is a process of making synthetic rubber and its novelty…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Edwin J. Vandenberg v. William B. ReynoldsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Smith v. SwaineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- Brooker v. RiesterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
3Cited by14 opinions
- Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. CurtissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Nitz v. EhrenreichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Duffy v. TegtmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Vincent J. Frilette and Paul B. Weisz v. Charles Newton Kimberlin, Jr. And Elroy Merle GladrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Allan Robert Andrew Beeber and Daniel S. Spechler v. Lester C. Krogh and Richard E. BrinkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.