Legal Opinion

Torsten Hasselstrom and Malcolm C. Henry v. Blaine C. McKusick

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 12, 1963No. Patent Appeal 7032PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences, one member dissenting, awarding priority of invention in Interference No. 90,025 to Mc-Kusick, the senior party. 1 Hasselstrom and Henry, the junior party, 2 have appealed.

The subject matter is a process for irradiating ammonium acetate for conversion to and recovery of amino acids as defined by the single count:

1. A process for converting ammonium acetate into amino acids which comprises, irradiating ammonium acetate with ionizing radiation equivalent to at least about one million electron volts until…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thurston v. WulffCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  2. Searle v. GlarumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. Senkus v. JohnstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  4. Benjamin Phillips and Paul S. Starcher v. Arthur W. CarlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  5. Reed v. CislakCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Knorr v. PearsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. Luis Edwardo-Franco, Rocio Gallego, A/K/A "Mariela Florez", Jorge Lopez and Sergio Castro-MunozCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. State v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  4. Kenneth L. Berry v. Watt W. Webb, William A. Wissler and William D. ForgengCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  5. In re ReuterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API