Legal Opinion
Ritter v. Rohm & Haas Company
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 28, 1967No. 64 Civ. 3216PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacMAHON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, John J. Ritter, New York University Professor Emeritus in organic chemistry, sues for infringement of his United States patent, No. 2,573,673, entitled “Method of Producing N-Mono Substituted Imidic Compounds,” 1 issued October 30, 1951 on a continuation in part application filed May 27, 1950 and an earlier application filed January 27, 1945. Defendant, Rohm & Haas Company, a manufacturer of chemicals, denies infringement and counterclaims for declaratory judgment of noninfringement, invalidity, and unenforcéability.
Only claims 1, 4-7, 13, and 16-18…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pennsylvania Environmental Council, Inc. v. BartlettDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- Grotrian, Helfferich, Schulz, Th. Steinweg Nachf. v. Steinway & SonsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Amax Fly Ash Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Xerox Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.