Legal Opinion
Horwath v. Lee
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided November 10, 1977No. Appeal No. 77-561PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
Appeal from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences (board) awarding priority to Long under 35 U.S.C. § 102(g) because Horwath et al. (Horwath) suppressed or concealed the invention. We affirm.
Background
Horwath is junior by virtue of application serial No. 207,573 filed December 13, 1971, entitled “Process for Enzymatically Isomerizing Glucose to Fructose.” Lee et al. (Lee) are senior by virtue of patent No. 3,645,848 issued February 29, 1972, entitled “Process for Preparing Glucose Isomerase,” on application serial No. 877,474 filed November 17, *9491969. During…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mason v. HepburnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1898
- Kawai v. MetlesicsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Young v. DworkinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Myers v. FeigelmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Silvestri v. GrantCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Invitrogen Corp. (Formerly Known as Life Technologies, Inc.) v. Clontech Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Frank E. Paulik and Robert G. Schultz v. Nabil Rizkalla and Charles N. WinnickCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Anne D. Nickola v. Kenneth Peterson, D/B/A Kaydee Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.