Legal Opinion
Application of Vincent J. Frilette and Paul B. Weisz
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 14, 1971No. Patent Appeal 8400PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANE, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals insofar as it affirmed the rejection of claims 1, 2, 12, 13, 20-22 and 24 in appellants’ application serial No. 559,061, filed June 21, 1966, for “Catalytic Conversion of Hydrocarbons.” The application is a division of appellants’ co-pending application serial No. 763,433, filed September 26, 1958.
The history of the parent application is essential in understanding the issues now before us. Appellants provoked an interference between their parent application and a patent to Kimberlin et al. by copying the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Application of Klaus Heinz Risse, Ulrich Horlein and Wolfgang Wirth. Application of Ulrich Horlein, Wolfgang Wirth and Klaus Heinz RisseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of KyridesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- Application of Hans Hilmer, Gerhard Korger, Rudi Weyer and Walter AumullerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Vincent J. Frilette and Paul B. Weisz v. Charles Newton Kimberlin, Jr. And Elroy Merle GladrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Alex ZletzCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- In re BaxterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Nitz v. EhrenreichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Stoudt v. GuggenheimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- In Re Charles H. Kroekel and Frederick A. PfaffCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.