Legal Opinion
Zapolsky v. Sacks
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 23, 1983No. 11000PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSponzo, J.
In this appeal from a judgment awarding damages for breach of contract and ordering a reconveyance of property because of fraud, the defendants claim that the court erred in that (1) it failed to conclude that the statute of limitations barred the plain tiffs recovery of a portion of damages under a certain agreement and (2) it concluded that the defendants participated in a fraudulent conveyance.
In a well written memorandum of decision the trial judge detailed the following facts which are substantially unchallenged: On August 21, 1963 the plaintiff Belle Zapolsky (then Belle Russin) and the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Town Bank & Trust Co. v. BensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Turgeon v. TurgeonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Clark v. DiefendorfSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Citizens Bank of Clearwater v. Warren W. Hunt, Edward E. Hunt, and Sylvia C. Hunt, Edward E. Hunt and Sylvia C. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- State v. GogginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Gaudio v. GaudioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Falls Church Group, Ltd. v. Tyler, Cooper & Alcorn, LLPSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.