Legal Opinion

Clark v. Diefendorf

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 10, 1929PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

The appellant is a physician. Annie K. Joslin died in New Haven April 12th, 1927, leaving a will in which she named him as executor. Thereafter he presented to himself as executor a bill amounting to $3080.15 for professional services rendered the decedent beginning October 11th, 1908, and continuing until her death. This bill was divided into three sections; the first included visits to him at his office from the time he began his charges until the end of the year 1913, for which he charged $5 each; from that time almost up to her death he charged at the rate of $250 a year; during her last…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. GarganoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. Board of Water Commissioners v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  3. Claim of Marcellus v. Estate of MarcellusNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Firszt v. Capitol Park Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  5. Vincent v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Asso.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1904

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. O'Dea v. AmodeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  2. Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. GalloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  4. Zapolsky v. SacksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Graybill v. PlantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API