Legal Opinion
Gaudio v. Gaudio
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 18, 1990No. 7630PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
This appeal stems from an action for the dissolution of a marriage and fraudulent conveyance brought by the plaintiff. Arthur Gaudio, the plaintiff’s former husband, was the original defendant (Gaudio). Frank Eannelli was later joined as a defendant in the *289fraudulent transfer count of the plaintiffs complaint. Only Eannelli has appealed from the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court found certain facts relevant. The Gaudios were married in 1962 and separated in 1972 or 1973. The plaintiff filed the present dissolution action in 1985. During the time that the Gaudios lived together, the…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Ed Peters Jewelry Co. v. C & J Jewelry Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Watson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Hilton v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.