Legal Opinion
Kaplan v. Kaplan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 2, 1982PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpeziale, C. J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the judgment of the trial court denying the plaintiff’s motion for modification of periodic alimony. The plaintiff claims error in the trial court’s failure to order a modification of alimony under the authority of § 46b-86 (b) of the General Statutes, the so-called “cohabitation” statute.
*388We first heard argument on this appeal on June 5, 1981, after which this court remanded the case with direction that the trial court, which had simply denied the plaintiff’s motion, provide an articulation of the basis of its decision.1 Kaplan v. Kaplan, 185 Conn. 42,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Gallo v. GalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Koizim v. KoizimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Styles v. TylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. DubnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.