Legal Opinion
State v. Goggin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 16, 1988No. 13379PublishedCited by 108 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
This action was instituted by the state of Connecticut acting through the commissioner of the department of income maintenance (DIM) under General Statutes §§ 17-83Z1 and 17-83m2 against *608several defendants3 seeking recovery for state assistance furnished under its Medicaid program to Patrick Goggin (Goggin), an incapable person. After the pleadings were closed, two defendants, June Aleksiewicz and Janet Braiewa (defendants) filed a motion for summary judgment which was granted. The state has appealed from that judgment. We find error.
The relevant background circumstances are the following. On…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Connelly v. Housing Authority of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- James L. v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Williams v. Best Cleaners, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Connecticut National Bank v. Great Neck Development Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.